As negotiations take place in Paris, we, the undersigned, would like to suggest a new kind of conversation about climate change.
Instead of asking, or even begging, corporations and countries to please reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, we would like to follow The Pope's lead and suggest that there is a simpler, more effective and more just way to deal with the existential threat facing life on this planet ... and to agree with Pope Francis that the core issue is, indeed, a moral and ethical one.
We ask the world leaders and their delegates to agree on one sentence. A sentence that will end the root cause of the pollution of the planet, a sentence that will end the overt and covert subsidies that artificially encourage the emission of greenhouse gases, a sentence that celebrates true, full and honest "free market capitalism" and a sentence that will restore morality to the conduct of governments and corporations around the world. That sentence would read something like this:
"We hereby agree to phase into effect, as quickly as practically possible, measures to fully and transparently account for the costs of developing, producing, transporting, selling and consuming those products generating greenhouse gases and to honestly and fully factor the costs and impact of all such emissions, including all future downstream 'negative externalities,' into the costs of these products."
And why wouldn't the health care costs from inhaling fumes from burning fossil fuels, the military costs of protecting fossil fuel supplies in foreign and hostile countries, the irreparable loss of biodiversity from cutting down rain forests to raise cattle or grow palm oil and even the price of the extremely harmful methane emissions coming out of both ends of cows and pigs on factory farms be included in the cost of coal, of oil, or natural gas and even the meat we eat?
All of these together, and more, are the "negative externalities" that have, until now, been almost completely ignored. They do, however, create enormous changes to our climate and are enormously costly -- stronger storms costing billions of additional dollars, extreme drought costing billions of dollars of damage to food supplies, food shortages causing hunger and increased costs to obtain food elsewhere, increased wildfires costing billions, destruction of coral reefs and other sensitive ecosystems, causing current damage to fishing supplies and untold damage to our very web of life well into the future, and many other devastating effects.
Not to include the costs of such "negative externalities" into the cost of the products that produce greenhouse gases actually subsidizes pollution and allows corporations and utilities to privatize profits while, at the same time, socializing the costs. It is not moral and it is not ethical to continue this form of incomplete accounting and to require others, especially poor people and poor countries, to shoulder the destructive burdens of climate change as a result.
It's simple accounting. It's honest accounting. It's what a true "free market" requires ... and it is the right and moral thing to do.
This one sentence, alone, can change the conversation in Paris and the course of our climate, permanently, from this point on. Whether it begins with putting a price on carbon, or "Cap and Trade" or "Cap and Dividend" or any number of other solutions that have been suggested, what is required -- even beyond a potentially historic agreement on reductions and targets -- is an immediate and total commitment to core human values as we take on the urgent task of saving humanity.
And thus we call on all world leaders at COP 21 to embrace Pope Francis' pleas, to adopt just, honest and transparent accounting practices and, after hundreds of years of giving companies and governments a free ride, to finally and simply require that those who pollute our planet pay for the damage that they cause.
Sheldon Whitehouse, Member of The United States Senate
Alan Grayson, Member of The United States House of Representatives
Lord Anthony St. John of Bledsoe, Member of The British House of Lords
Sting, Musician and Environmentalist
Graham Nash, Musician and Environmentalist
Jason Mraz, Musician and Environmentalist
Richard Greene, Communication Strategist
Lisa Ling, Television Journalist
Paul Song, Physician
Chevy Chase, Actor and Environmentalist
Jayni Chase, Environmentalist
Thom Hartmann, Author, Radio and Television Host
Louie Psyhoyos, Documentary Film Maker
Marshall Herskovitz, Producer and Writer
Richard Schiff, Actor and Environmentalist
Aimee Christensen, Environmentalist
Felix Finkbeiner, Student, Environmental Activist
Larry Schweiger, Fmr. ED, National Wildlife Feceration
Kevin Surace, Environmental Entrepreneur
Andy Lipkis, Founder, Tree People
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.![]()
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.![]()
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.![]()
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.![]()
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Instead of asking, or even begging, corporations and countries to please reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, we would like to follow The Pope's lead and suggest that there is a simpler, more effective and more just way to deal with the existential threat facing life on this planet ... and to agree with Pope Francis that the core issue is, indeed, a moral and ethical one.
We ask the world leaders and their delegates to agree on one sentence. A sentence that will end the root cause of the pollution of the planet, a sentence that will end the overt and covert subsidies that artificially encourage the emission of greenhouse gases, a sentence that celebrates true, full and honest "free market capitalism" and a sentence that will restore morality to the conduct of governments and corporations around the world. That sentence would read something like this:
"We hereby agree to phase into effect, as quickly as practically possible, measures to fully and transparently account for the costs of developing, producing, transporting, selling and consuming those products generating greenhouse gases and to honestly and fully factor the costs and impact of all such emissions, including all future downstream 'negative externalities,' into the costs of these products."
And why wouldn't the health care costs from inhaling fumes from burning fossil fuels, the military costs of protecting fossil fuel supplies in foreign and hostile countries, the irreparable loss of biodiversity from cutting down rain forests to raise cattle or grow palm oil and even the price of the extremely harmful methane emissions coming out of both ends of cows and pigs on factory farms be included in the cost of coal, of oil, or natural gas and even the meat we eat?
All of these together, and more, are the "negative externalities" that have, until now, been almost completely ignored. They do, however, create enormous changes to our climate and are enormously costly -- stronger storms costing billions of additional dollars, extreme drought costing billions of dollars of damage to food supplies, food shortages causing hunger and increased costs to obtain food elsewhere, increased wildfires costing billions, destruction of coral reefs and other sensitive ecosystems, causing current damage to fishing supplies and untold damage to our very web of life well into the future, and many other devastating effects.
Not to include the costs of such "negative externalities" into the cost of the products that produce greenhouse gases actually subsidizes pollution and allows corporations and utilities to privatize profits while, at the same time, socializing the costs. It is not moral and it is not ethical to continue this form of incomplete accounting and to require others, especially poor people and poor countries, to shoulder the destructive burdens of climate change as a result.
It's simple accounting. It's honest accounting. It's what a true "free market" requires ... and it is the right and moral thing to do.
This one sentence, alone, can change the conversation in Paris and the course of our climate, permanently, from this point on. Whether it begins with putting a price on carbon, or "Cap and Trade" or "Cap and Dividend" or any number of other solutions that have been suggested, what is required -- even beyond a potentially historic agreement on reductions and targets -- is an immediate and total commitment to core human values as we take on the urgent task of saving humanity.
And thus we call on all world leaders at COP 21 to embrace Pope Francis' pleas, to adopt just, honest and transparent accounting practices and, after hundreds of years of giving companies and governments a free ride, to finally and simply require that those who pollute our planet pay for the damage that they cause.
Sheldon Whitehouse, Member of The United States Senate
Alan Grayson, Member of The United States House of Representatives
Lord Anthony St. John of Bledsoe, Member of The British House of Lords
Sting, Musician and Environmentalist
Graham Nash, Musician and Environmentalist
Jason Mraz, Musician and Environmentalist
Richard Greene, Communication Strategist
Lisa Ling, Television Journalist
Paul Song, Physician
Chevy Chase, Actor and Environmentalist
Jayni Chase, Environmentalist
Thom Hartmann, Author, Radio and Television Host
Louie Psyhoyos, Documentary Film Maker
Marshall Herskovitz, Producer and Writer
Richard Schiff, Actor and Environmentalist
Aimee Christensen, Environmentalist
Felix Finkbeiner, Student, Environmental Activist
Larry Schweiger, Fmr. ED, National Wildlife Feceration
Kevin Surace, Environmental Entrepreneur
Andy Lipkis, Founder, Tree People
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
